Built by Dave Cross.
Powered by Perlanet

Jeff Smith MP welcomes £331 million cash injection for Manchester City Council to boost local services.
Under the Tories, local authorities were starved of investment, with core spending power down by around a quarter since 2010. That put immense pressure on councils up and down the country, including Manchester City Council.
But the Labour Government has announced a radical overhaul of how local government is funded, reversing Rishi Sunak’s efforts to put money into wealthy shires and Tory seats.
Fair Funding is the next step on Labour’s journey to build stronger communities and reverse a decade and a half of austerity and decline under the Conservatives and Lib Dems.
England’s councils will get [over £XX billion] for essential services with more money going to places with the greatest need.
The funding injection is aimed at restoring pride and opportunity in places that have been left behind, to get back what has been lost. Councils will have more resources available to bring back libraries, youth services, clean streets, and community hubs.
The money is part of the first multi-year funding settlement in over a decade, giving councils three years of financial certainty so they can plan ahead rather than firefight year to year.
In total, councils will see an [X] per cent increase in their core spending power compared to 2024-25 to pay for services including bin collections, housing, and children’s services.
And in a turning point for the way local government is funded, the outdated system that saw some councils build up savings while others faced financial collapse has been replaced.
Instead, places are now being funded using an evidence-based system that properly recognises local circumstances and the true costs of providing services in deprived communities.
Labour Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Steve Reed said:
“This is a turning point, a chance to turn the page on a decade of cuts and callousness, and for local leaders to invest in getting back what has been lost – to bring back libraries, youth services, clean streets, and community hubs.
“For too long, deprived communities were left behind. Today we’re ending the postcode lottery so everyone can access the services their community deserves.”
Manchester Withington MP, Jeff Smith said:
“I well remember the painful decisions that our Council had to take after the coalition government brought in its austerity policies in 2011. So I joined other Manchester MPs in writing to the government asking to confirm a substantial uplift in funding for our Council. I’m pleased after 14 years of Tory austerity, Labour is putting money back into our local services in Manchester”
Stephen Morgan, Labour’s MP for Portsmouth, has welcomed new government plans to give victims of domestic abuse and child sexual abuse faster, more reliable access to NHS support.
This Labour government is introducing dedicated referral services through GPs, connecting victims with specialist local support, alongside up to £50 million in trauma-informed care for child abuse survivors.
The Steps to Safety programme will ensure victims can access local domestic abuse and sexual violence services without delay, while the Child House model will give children the care they need in one place – ending the need for children to relive their trauma through repeated interviews.
For years, the Tories let victims down, leaving support patchy and creating a postcode lottery where access to care depended on where you live.
The changes announced today will end the lottery in care, ensuring there are dedicated referral services for women and girls affected by violence and abuse in every area of England by 2029.
Stephen has previously met with British organisation Stop Domestic Abuse to discuss their work in Portsmouth, visit their Dispersed Accommodation Service and meet with the service’s residents.
Commenting, Stephen Morgan MP for Portsmouth South said:
“I welcome Ministers taking action to prioritise victims and in doing so, delivering on a manifesto commitment made to the British people.
“The announcement on additional funding will help ensure support to those who have suffered through domestic abuse.
“At the heart of that support, is a commitment to safety and stability. Survivors and their children will be able to access support in safe accommodation, such as domestic abuse refuges, in confidential locations, far from the reach of perpetrators.
This includes tailored move-on support to help women secure long-term housing and rebuild their lives. This is very welcome news for survivors and their families in Portsmouth”.
Labour’s Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:
“Victims and survivors of abuse need more than promises – they need change.
“No child should also face their darkest moment alone or be forced to relive their trauma repeatedly to multiple professionals.
“As a service that often has first eyes on abuse victims, the NHS plays a vital role in supporting and treating victims. These changes will put victims first, making sure they have specialist care and reliable support when they need it most.”
These initiatives build on Labour’s commitment to supporting victims and form part of its wider strategy to halve violence against women and girls over the next decade.
The government has invested £550 million in the Victims Support Fund and introduced Raneem’s Law, placing domestic abuse specialists in 999 control rooms across the first five police forces. Labour is also providing £20 million this year to specialist organisations delivering vital front-line support – investment the Tories failed to prioritise.
Further measures will be set out later today with the launch of the Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy, marking the largest crackdown on violence against women and girls in British history. The strategy includes over £1 billion to support victims and tougher action against perpetrators.
By 2029, all police forces will have dedicated rape and sexual offence investigation teams, and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders will be rolled out across England and Wales, with curfews, electronic tagging and exclusion zones for abusers. Since their rollout last year, these orders have already protected more than 1,000 victims, with breaches punishable by up to five years in prison.
The post Labour delivering real change for abuse survivors in Portsmouth, says Stephen Morgan appeared first on Stephen Morgan MP.
I recently met the Speaker of the House of Commons, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, to present him with the winning entries from my Christmas Card competition.
The designs by Isla-Grace Dininno (Swiss Valley Primary) and George Davies (Ysgol Gymraeg Brynsierfel) are now on display in the Speaker’s Rooms in Parliament over the Christmas period alongside artwork from similar competitions across the country.
George Freeman writes for FarmersGuardian.
The Home Office proposal to lump shotgun licensing in with tighter controls historically reserved for rifles and other firearms marks a significant step in Whitehall hostility to country sports, the rural economy and the rural way of life.
I fear it is likely to do nothing to reduce knife and handgun crime on the streets of our major cities, and will instead cause huge extra costs of administration, soaking up the extra charges, which hits marginal rural economies the hardest.
My concerns are not only echoed by leading countryside organisations like the Countryside Alliance, CLA and BASC but the very rural communities - like my constituency of Mid Norfolk - where widespread shotgun use is responsible, safe and key to many small businesses in the local economy.
I grew up on a family farm in Norfolk. Beating and shooting on our small family shoot was an essential part of my upbringing.
Shooting has shaped not just my own experience, but the social and economic foundations of the communities I represent.
Anyone familiar with rural Norfolk, and the many rural counties across the country, will understand what Whitehall policymakers seem not to understand - shooting is integral to local jobs, conservation, food production and the wider rural economy.
The Government insists the licensing merger is about safety.
After the tragic Plymouth shooting in 2021, the previous Conservative Government examined this proposal precisely and chose not to proceed because of its disproportionate impact on legitimate rural activity.
Those arguments remain every bit as valid today.
The evidence is clear.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) has stated that legally held firearms are rarely used criminally by the lawful owner.
Furthermore, the majority of criminally used firearms are smuggled in from abroad.
Over the past decade, figures from the NCA show that deaths due to firearms has remained consistent, with the highest levels of gun crime concentrated in large urban police force areas — the West Midlands, the Metropolitan Police area and South Yorkshire.
Now compare that with the areas that hold the highest number of shotgun certificates: Norfolk, Dyfed-Powys and North Yorkshire.
These are some of the most rural counties in the country — the heartlands of farming, conservation, and country sports.
They are not the centres of gun crime.
The real risk posed by the Government's proposal is not to public safety, but to our rural way of life.
Shooting-related small businesses play a vital role in sustaining many rural economies.
Game shoots support vital habitat management and wildlife conservation.
From hotels, B&Bs, food catering for shoots, equipment and employment, game shooting brings much-needed income to rural economies, supporting local butchers and small businesses and providing healthy and sustainable food.
Country sports are becoming increasingly important pillars of a rural economy already under huge pressure from high energy costs and agricultural disinvestment.
Commercial shooting estates, gun shops, clay grounds, competitive shooting clubs, these are not marginal niche interests in rural areas.
They are interlocking parts of a sector that supports tens of thousands of jobs nationwide.
By merging licensing systems, the Government would impose new layers of bureaucracy, longer delays, higher costs, and the very real likelihood that many people, especially younger or lower-income participants, will simply give up the sport.
For gun shops and shooting estates, that drop in participation would mean sharp reductions in trade, reduced investment and potential job losses.
or rural villages already battling depopulation, cost of living pressures and dwindling economic opportunities, the cumulative impact could be devastating. Why?
I urge ministers to think again and recognise this is a policy with no benefits but a lot of costs.
It is anti-growth, anti-countryside, anti-rural voters.
It could drive a potentially serious political revolt in rural areas.
The Home Secretary has a reputation for demonstrating common sense, which this policy urgently needs.
The post November Newsletter appeared first on Mohammad Yasin MP.
Sure Start was life-changing for so many people in Bassetlaw, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life. Sure Start, introduced by the last Labour government, helped level the playing field for children from lower income families, with research showing that children who attended a Sure Start centre were much more likely to perform better at school.
The previous Government cut community services, scrapping Sure Start, leaving a gaping hole in family services. When they left government, one in four families with children under five couldn’t access local children’s centres, rising to one in three lower income families. Speaking to local families in Bassetlaw, I hear time and again an ask for more support around SEND, youth services, and early development.
I welcome the news that the Government are building on the proud legacy of Sure Start, and reviving family services by rolling out 1,000 ‘Best Start Family Hubs’ by April 2026, including here in Bassetlaw.
Best Start Family Hubs will be a one stop shop for parents needing support, including on difficulty breastfeeding, housing issues or children’s early development, and other services such as:
The post Giving Children in Bassetlaw the Best Start in Life appeared first on Jo White MP.
It was great to call into Neighbourhood Watch in Pelsall again and catch up with Edwin and Andrew.
We discussed a range of local issues across the Rushall, Shelfield, Pelsall, and Brownhills Neighbourhood Watch area. Our focus was on how we can work together as one community to address these challenges.
It was also fantastic to hear about Project Phoenix – a pilot community-run initiative launched by Walsall Council! This project is dedicated to building a stronger community right across our Borough, and I’m really keen to see the positive impact it will have.
An abridged version of this article ran in The Times on 3rd February 2025
In 2007, in the pages of this newspaper, I argued that Britain should seize the moment and move Heathrow to the Thames Estuary, freeing up the congested west London site for much-needed housing while creating a world-leading transport hub fit for the 21st century. It was an ambitious plan—perhaps too ambitious for a nation that has lost its appetite for grand infrastructure. Seventeen years later, what do we have? The same tired debates, the same dithering, and now, a third runway proposal that represents the absolute minimum of what could be done. It is not a vision; it is a concession to stagnation.
Throughout history, Britain built infrastructure that transformed cities and continents. The Victorians laid thousands of miles of railways across India and Africa. British engineers built the world’s first underground railway in London, the great docks of Hong Kong, and the vast shipping hubs that made global trade possible. Ours was once a nation that saw scale and complexity as challenges to be overcome, not reasons to prevaricate. Today, while China constructs floating airports in Hong Kong and Dalian, we are still arguing over a few extra miles of tarmac at an aging airport hemmed in by suburban sprawl.
The case for expanding Heathrow is undeniable. The airport operates at near capacity, with any disruption causing delays that ripple across the global aviation network. Additional capacity is needed. But the third runway is not a bold leap forward—it is an unimaginative compromise. The design is a relic of a bygone era when Britain was still willing to approve large infrastructure projects but had already begun its slow descent into cautious incrementalism. Surely for a solution we should be looking beyond the immediate horizon, daring to create something transformative.
Compare this to the grand infrastructure ambitions of Asia. Hong Kong’s Chek Lap Kok, which replaced the legendary but perilous Kai Tak airport in the 1990s, was built on reclaimed land. It was a marvel of engineering (mostly British), completed in just six years. Now, China is taking the concept even further: Dalian is constructing a floating airport, pushing the boundaries of what is possible. This is a country that doesn’t simply accept geographic limitations—it overcomes them. Britain, meanwhile, is paralysed by protest groups, endless consultations, and political hand-wringing.
A floating airport in the Thames Estuary—an idea proposed and swiftly dismissed—would have been a statement of ambition. London could have had its own Chek Lap Kok, a world-class hub unencumbered by the constraints of Heathrow’s location. Instead, we are left with a piecemeal expansion of an outdated site, in a project that will take decades and still leave Britain trailing behind.
The environmental argument against expansion is often cited as a reason for delay, but it is a red herring. Modern aviation is rapidly advancing towards lower emissions and greater efficiency. If the concern is air pollution and carbon footprints, the answer is not to stifle airport expansion but to embrace new technology, support cleaner aviation fuels, and invest in modern air traffic management. Britain should be leading these efforts, not using environmental concerns as an excuse for stagnation.
The economic cost of our hesitation is immense. Aviation is a key driver of trade, tourism, and investment. Heathrow’s constraints mean we lose out to European rivals, with airlines shifting long-haul routes to Paris, Amsterdam, and Frankfurt. The third runway, even if built, will do little to reclaim lost ground. By the time it is operational—assuming it even survives the judicial challenges that will inevitably come—other nations will have long since surpassed us.
What Britain needs is a fundamental shift in mindset. We must stop viewing major infrastructure projects as necessary evils to be endured and start treating them as national priorities. This requires reforming our planning laws, streamlining approval processes, and fostering a political culture that celebrates engineering excellence rather than recoiling from it.
The third runway at Heathrow is not the answer—it is a symptom of our decline. Instead of an afterthought tacked onto an aging airport, we should be considering radical alternatives: offshore airports, high-speed rail integration to regional hubs, and a renewed commitment to infrastructure that places Britain at the forefront of global connectivity. We were once a nation that built the world’s most advanced transport networks, that pioneered engineering breakthroughs others only dreamed of. We can be that nation again—but only if we stop settling for mediocrity and start daring to think bigger.
The world is not waiting for Britain to catch up. While we squabble over a single new runway, China is building entire new airports on water. The contrast is stark, and the lesson is clear: boldness breeds success, hesitation ensures decline. If Britain truly wishes to remain a global player, we must abandon the timid incrementalism of the third runway and embrace the kind of audacity that once made us great.
Kit Malthouse 1st February 2025
Christmas is a very special time. It's when we come together with friends and family to take stock, and give thanks for what we have.
Some years – in the best of times, this is cause for celebration.
Other years – it's more complicated if we're missing loved ones,
affected by illness, or facing money worries, homelessness, or loneliness.
Sometimes – let’s be honest, for many reasons, Christmas can just be about getting through it, and that's ok!
Because regardless of the year that’s been, or the circumstances you find yourself in, Christmas offers everyone a precious gift – hope.
The post Toby Perkins MP supports Chesterfield Hedgehog Rescue and Rehabilitation appeared first on Toby Perkins Labour MP.